Re: Passthough security fix.

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl@regent.push.net)
Tue, 21 Apr 1998 02:11:16 +0000 (GMT)

Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 02:11:16 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@regent.push.net>
To:	Jeremy Allison <jallison@whistle.com>
Subject: Re: Passthough security fix.
In-Reply-To: <353BEE06.3B54AFBF@whistle.com>

On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Jeremy Allison wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I was chatting with Roger Binns (author of
> VisionFS, he's out in Santa Cruz at the moment so
> we got to exchange CIFS gossip :-), and he came
> out with a wonderful solution to the NT bug that
> means NT Server doesn't set the guest bit when
> logging on a user in pass-though security.

ok, i am intrigued. is the "domain" sent in the OEM information in the
pass-through request? or is the "workstation" name?

both are valid: they have different effects.

luke