# Complete Workflow: Combining Genetic and Non-Genetic Evidence

#### Franco L. Marsico

#### 2026-01-08

## Introduction

This vignette demonstrates a complete workflow for missing person identification combining genetic DNA evidence with non-genetic preliminary investigation evidence (sex, age, hair color).

### The Case Scenario

A family is searching for their missing relative with the following known characteristics:

- Sex: Female
- Age at disappearance: 25 years old
- Hair color: Dark brown (category 2)

A person of interest (POI) has been found with:

- Observed sex: Female
- Estimated age: 27 years (within expected range)
- Hair color: Dark brown

We will evaluate this match using both:

1. Non-genetic preliminary evidence
2. Genetic DNA comparison with family reference

## Setup

    library(mispitools)
    library(forrel)     # For genetic simulations
    library(pedtools)   # For pedigree operations

## Part 1: Non-Genetic Evidence

### Step 1.1: Define Error Rates

Error rates (epsilon) account for uncertainty in observations:

    # Probability of misrecording biological sex
    eps_sex <- 0.02

    # Probability of age estimate being outside true range
    eps_age <- 0.05

    # Hair color observation error matrix
    eps_color <- error_matrix_hair(ep = 0.05)  # 5% error rate

### Step 1.2: Calculate Individual LRs

Sex Evidence:

    # MP is female (H=1), POI observed as female
    lr_sex_result <- lr_sex(
      LR = TRUE,
      H = 1,          # True hypothesis (MP is female)
      nsims = 1,
      eps = eps_sex,
      erRs = 0.01     # Database recording error
    )
    #> Warning: Parameter 'nsims' is deprecated. Use 'numsims' instead.

    cat("LR for sex evidence:", lr_sex_result$LRs, "\n")
    #> LR for sex evidence: 1.96

Age Evidence:

    # MP age = 25, tolerance = 5 years (so 20-30 is acceptable)
    # POI age = 27 (falls within range)
    lr_age_result <- lr_age(
      LR = TRUE,
      H = 1,          # True hypothesis
      nsims = 1,
      epa = eps_age,
      erRa = 0.01,
      MPa = 25,       # MP age
      MPr = 5         # Range tolerance
    )
    #> Warning: Parameter 'nsims' is deprecated. Use 'numsims' instead.

    cat("LR for age evidence:", lr_age_result$LRa, "\n")
    #> LR for age evidence: 7.6

Hair Color Evidence:

    # MP has color 2 (dark brown), POI observed as color 2
    lr_color_result <- lr_hair_color(
      LR = TRUE,
      H = 1,          # True hypothesis
      nsims = 1,
      MPc = 2,        # MP hair color
      epc = eps_color,
      erRc = eps_color
    )
    #> Warning: Parameter 'nsims' is deprecated. Use 'numsims' instead.

    cat("LR for hair color:", lr_color_result$LRc, "\n")
    #> LR for hair color: 4.840271

### Step 1.3: Combined Non-Genetic LR

    # Combine all non-genetic evidence
    lr_nongenetic <- lr_sex_result$LRs * lr_age_result$LRa * lr_color_result$LRc
    cat("Combined non-genetic LR:", round(lr_nongenetic, 2), "\n")
    #> Combined non-genetic LR: 72.1
    cat("Log10(LR):", round(log10(lr_nongenetic), 2), "\n")
    #> Log10(LR): 1.86

### Step 1.4: Visualize the CPTs

    # Population CPT (H2)
    cpt_h2 <- cpt_population(
      propS = c(0.5, 0.5),
      MPa = 25,
      MPr = 5,
      propC = c(0.15, 0.35, 0.25, 0.15, 0.10)  # Realistic color distribution
    )

    # MP CPT (H1)
    cpt_h1 <- cpt_missing_person(
      MPs = 1,        # Female
      MPc = 2,        # Dark brown
      eps = eps_sex,
      epa = eps_age,
      epc = eps_color
    )

    # Visualize both CPTs and LR heatmap
    plot_cpt(cpt_h2, cpt_h1)

## Part 2: Genetic Evidence (Simulation)

For illustration, we’ll show how to simulate genetic LRs using a parent-child relationship pedigree. Note: This code is provided for reference but not executed in this vignette to avoid dependency on specific pedigree structures.

### Step 2.1: Create Pedigree

    # Create a simple pedigree: parent-child relationship
    # The missing person (ID 5) is child of individual 2

    # Using linearPed to create grandparent-parent-child
    ped <- linearPed(2)  # 5 individuals

    # Add genetic markers from Norwegian population
    ped <- setMarkers(ped, locusAttributes = NorwegianFrequencies[1:10])

    # Simulate a profile for the reference person
    set.seed(123)
    ped <- profileSim(ped, N = 1, ids = 2)[[1]]

### Step 2.2: Simulate Genetic LRs

    # Simulate genetic LRs
    genetic_sims <- sim_lr_genetic(
      reference = ped,
      missing = 5,
      numsims = 100,
      seed = 456
    )

    # Convert to dataframe
    genetic_df <- lr_to_dataframe(genetic_sims)

    # Visualize
    plot_lr_distribution(genetic_df)

For this demonstration, we’ll use pre-computed example values:

    # Example genetic LR values (pre-computed)
    # These represent typical values from parent-child testing
    set.seed(42)
    genetic_df <- data.frame(
      Related = 10^rnorm(100, mean = 3, sd = 1.5),
      Unrelated = 10^rnorm(100, mean = -0.5, sd = 1)
    )

    cat("Summary of log10(LR) under H1 (Related):\n")
    #> Summary of log10(LR) under H1 (Related):
    summary(log10(genetic_df$Related))
    #>    Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max.
    #>  -1.490   2.075   3.135   3.049   3.992   6.430

    cat("\nSummary of log10(LR) under H2 (Unrelated):\n")
    #>
    #> Summary of log10(LR) under H2 (Unrelated):
    summary(log10(genetic_df$Unrelated))
    #>     Min.  1st Qu.   Median     Mean  3rd Qu.     Max.
    #> -2.52468 -1.09150 -0.56929 -0.58748 -0.03821  2.20189

### Step 2.3: Visualize Genetic LR Distributions

    # Plot the LR distributions
    plot_lr_distribution(genetic_df)

## Part 3: Combining All Evidence

### Step 3.1: Prior Probability

We need to specify a prior probability that a random POI is the MP. This depends on the size of the candidate population:

    # If there are ~10,000 potential candidates
    prior_prob <- 1/10000

    # Convert to prior odds
    prior_odds <- prior_prob / (1 - prior_prob)
    cat("Prior probability:", prior_prob, "\n")
    #> Prior probability: 1e-04
    cat("Prior odds:", prior_odds, "\n")
    #> Prior odds: 0.00010001

### Step 3.2: Posterior Odds Calculation

The posterior odds combine all evidence:

\[\text{Posterior Odds} = \text{Prior Odds} \times LR_{genetic} \times LR_{nongenetic}\]

    # For the simulations under H1 (true match scenario)
    posterior_h1 <- prior_odds * genetic_df$Related * lr_nongenetic

    # For simulations under H2 (no match scenario)
    posterior_h2 <- prior_odds * genetic_df$Unrelated * lr_nongenetic

    # Summary
    cat("Posterior odds under H1 (median):", round(median(posterior_h1), 4), "\n")
    #> Posterior odds under H1 (median): 9.8328
    cat("Posterior odds under H2 (median):", round(median(posterior_h2), 6), "\n")
    #> Posterior odds under H2 (median): 0.001945

### Step 3.3: Decision Threshold Analysis

    # Find optimal threshold with weight 10 (FP 10x worse than FN)
    threshold_result <- decision_threshold(
      datasim = genetic_df,
      weight = 10
    )
    #> Decision threshold is: 2694.0341

    # Calculate error rates at the optimal threshold
    rates <- threshold_rates(
      datasim = genetic_df,
      threshold = threshold_result
    )
    #> FNR = 0.56 ;  FPR = 0 ;  MCC = 0.5311

    # Check rates at different thresholds
    cat("\nError rates at different thresholds:\n")
    #>
    #> Error rates at different thresholds:
    for (t in c(1, 10, 100, 1000)) {
      r <- threshold_rates(genetic_df, threshold = t)
      cat(sprintf("LR > %5d: FPR=%.3f, FNR=%.3f, MCC=%.3f\n",
                  t, r$FPR, r$FNR, r$MCC))
    }
    #> FNR = 0.04 ;  FPR = 0.24 ;  MCC = 0.7348
    #> LR >     1: FPR=0.240, FNR=0.040, MCC=0.735
    #> FNR = 0.1 ;  FPR = 0.04 ;  MCC = 0.8616
    #> LR >    10: FPR=0.040, FNR=0.100, MCC=0.862
    #> FNR = 0.24 ;  FPR = 0.01 ;  MCC = 0.7707
    #> LR >   100: FPR=0.010, FNR=0.240, MCC=0.771
    #> FNR = 0.46 ;  FPR = 0 ;  MCC = 0.6082
    #> LR >  1000: FPR=0.000, FNR=0.460, MCC=0.608

    # Plot decision curve
    plot_decision_curve(
      datasim = genetic_df,
      LRmax = 10000
    )

## Part 4: Interpretation

### Strength of Evidence Categories

The LR quantifies how many times more likely the evidence is under H1 vs H2:

Log10(LR) | LR Range | Interpretation
--- | --- | ---
< 0 | < 1 | Supports H2 (not the MP)
0-1 | 1-10 | Weak support for H1
1-2 | 10-100 | Support for H1
2-4 | 100-10,000 | Strong support for H1
> 4 | > 10,000 | Very strong support for H1

### Our Case Results

    # Median genetic LR under H1
    median_genetic_lr <- median(genetic_df$Related)

    # Total LR
    total_lr <- median_genetic_lr * lr_nongenetic
    log10_total <- log10(total_lr)

    cat("Genetic LR (median under H1):", round(median_genetic_lr, 0), "\n")
    #> Genetic LR (median under H1): 1364
    cat("Non-genetic LR:", round(lr_nongenetic, 2), "\n")
    #> Non-genetic LR: 72.1
    cat("Total combined LR:", round(total_lr, 0), "\n")
    #> Total combined LR: 98318
    cat("Log10(Total LR):", round(log10_total, 2), "\n")
    #> Log10(Total LR): 4.99

## Part 5: Interactive Exploration

For interactive exploration of parameters and their effects, use the Shiny applications:

    # Basic CPT and LR visualization
    app_mispitools()

    # Advanced analysis with ROC curves
    app_lr_comparison()

## Conclusion

This workflow demonstrated how to:

1. Calculate LRs for non-genetic evidence (sex, age, hair color)
2. Simulate genetic LRs from pedigree-based relationships
3. Combine evidence using the Bayesian framework
4. Evaluate decision performance and error rates

The key advantage of combining evidence types is increased discrimination power, particularly useful in cases where genetic evidence alone may be inconclusive due to:

- Distant family relationships
- Limited number of markers
- Degraded samples

## Session Information

    sessionInfo()
    #> R version 4.5.2 (2025-10-31)
    #> Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
    #> Running under: Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    #>
    #> Matrix products: default
    #> BLAS:   /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/blas/libblas.so.3.12.0
    #> LAPACK: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lapack/liblapack.so.3.12.0  LAPACK version 3.12.0
    #>
    #> locale:
    #>  [1] LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8       LC_NUMERIC=C
    #>  [3] LC_TIME=es_ES.UTF-8        LC_COLLATE=C
    #>  [5] LC_MONETARY=es_ES.UTF-8    LC_MESSAGES=es_ES.UTF-8
    #>  [7] LC_PAPER=es_ES.UTF-8       LC_NAME=C
    #>  [9] LC_ADDRESS=C               LC_TELEPHONE=C
    #> [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
    #>
    #> time zone: America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires
    #> tzcode source: system (glibc)
    #>
    #> attached base packages:
    #> [1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base
    #>
    #> other attached packages:
    #> [1] forrel_1.8.1     pedtools_2.9.0   mispitools_1.4.0
    #>
    #> loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
    #>  [1] tidyr_1.3.2        sandwich_3.1-1     sass_0.4.10        generics_0.1.4
    #>  [5] lpSolve_5.6.23     stringi_1.8.7      verbalisr_0.7.2    lattice_0.22-7
    #>  [9] pROC_1.19.0.1      digest_0.6.39      magrittr_2.0.4     RColorBrewer_1.1-3
    #> [13] evaluate_1.0.5     grid_4.5.2         fastmap_1.2.0      plyr_1.8.9
    #> [17] jsonlite_2.0.0     Matrix_1.7-4       Formula_1.2-5      purrr_1.2.0
    #> [21] scales_1.4.0       pbapply_1.7-4      jquerylib_0.1.4    cli_3.6.5
    #> [25] rlang_1.1.6        miscTools_0.6-28   withr_3.0.2        cachem_1.1.0
    #> [29] yaml_2.3.12        otel_0.2.0         tools_4.5.2        parallel_4.5.2
    #> [33] reshape2_1.4.5     kinship2_1.9.6.2   dplyr_1.1.4        ggplot2_4.0.1
    #> [37] maxLik_1.5-2.2     vctrs_0.6.5        R6_2.6.1           zoo_1.8-15
    #> [41] lifecycle_1.0.4    stringr_1.6.0      pedprobr_1.0.1     pkgconfig_2.0.3
    #> [45] pillar_1.11.1      bslib_0.9.0        gtable_0.3.6       Rcpp_1.1.0
    #> [49] glue_1.8.0         pedmut_0.9.0       xfun_0.55          tibble_3.3.0
    #> [53] tidyselect_1.2.1   knitr_1.51         farver_2.1.2       DirichletReg_0.7-2
    #> [57] patchwork_1.3.2    htmltools_0.5.9    labeling_0.4.3     rmarkdown_2.30
    #> [61] compiler_4.5.2     S7_0.2.1           ribd_1.7.1         quadprog_1.5-8

## References

Marsico FL, Vigeland MD, Egeland T, Herrera Pinero F (2021). “Making decisions in missing person identification cases with low statistical power.” Forensic Science International: Genetics, 52, 102519.

Marsico FL, et al. (2023). “Likelihood ratios for non-genetic evidence in missing person cases.” Forensic Science International: Genetics, 66, 102891.